Marginal Stability Nose Cone Ring

Background

My first project in RPL, and my first extracurricular use of CAD and FEA. I was tasked with creating a lightweight, affordable, easy to manufacture, and easy to implement component to interface a composite nose cone with an aluminum airframe. This was motivated by (1) the need to eject the nose cone in order to deploy the rocket's parachutes and (2) the desire to avoid drilling holes in or otherwise altering the composite structure post-cure in order to mitigate structural performance degradation.

Design

The design was simple: a ring would be cut out of a solid block of Aluminum 6061-T6, a lathe would be used to create the lip, and the legs would be cut out of another block of aluminum before being welded to the ring. The lip acted as the interface between the ring and the nose cone, which would be adhesively bonded. The legs would each slide into structural C-channels and secured with shear pins which would be broken by an actuator when the nose cone is ejected. In the SolidWorks CAD assembly, the weld beads were individually modelled to account for different material properties.

Analysis

The primary analysis done on the nose cone ring was a static simulation accounting for the compressive force of the engine's thrust and aerodynamic drag pressure on the nose cone. In the simulation, the structural C-channels were fixed and treated as rigid bodies, and pin connectors were used to interface them with the nose cone ring. This was done to account for the contact forces between the top of the C-channels and the bottom of the ring. Additionally, all contacts were treated as no-penetration, with the exception of the contacts between the weld bead and the nose cone ring, which were treated as bonded. Iterative simulation and redesign was done until mass was minimized while maintaining a minimum factor of safety (FoS) of at least 1.5.

Conclusions

I brought this component to the PDR and pre-CDR phase, where I had completed design, analysis, source material, epoxy selection, bill of materials, and fabrication methods. The nose cone ring did not reach its CDR or see any components purchased due to the cancellation of Marginal Stability.

A Look Back

If I were to tackle the same design problem today with my more advanced skillset, I would consider a few more things:

  • Additional load cases

    • Dynamic compressive load during nose cone ejection

    • Dynamic vibration loads from both the engine and aerodynamic effects

    • Buckling

  • Cure characteristics of the adhesive and whether residual stresses would be a concern

  • Maximum required bond strength for various failure modes

  • Bond characteristics between the adhesive and each substrate (CFRP and aluminum)

  • Bond procedure (bonding a cylindrical surface inside of another cylindrical surface is not as straightforward as a single-lap joint due to the challenges of applying a uniform pressure)